<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: jehovah emergence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/</link>
	<description>i believed i would understand but it is late and i know nothing except laughter and weeping</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 20:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not of this World</title>
		<link>http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Not of this World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 04:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>the matter came up merely as an aside in OT class; i'm definitely no hebrew expert, but my source, Dr. Vall is, and he diagrammed the two versions of YWHW in hebrew, including the late BC versions with the Adonai vowel notations superimposed, producing the account given above, with the resultant contradistinguised pronounciations he demonstrated for us as the source of Jehovah vs. Yahweh. that there is debate on the account is definitely noted, and if i myself was a student of hebrew i could say more on it, but not quite there yet, although on my more ambitious days i am tempted : )  in the meantime i lean on an esteemed authority who knows of what he speaks, and whose account would have to be as fully demonstrated against for the alternative to seem more true.

and it's 'their' not 'there'
(just one of my little english grammatical pet peeves)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the matter came up merely as an aside in OT class; i&#8217;m definitely no hebrew expert, but my source, Dr. Vall is, and he diagrammed the two versions of YWHW in hebrew, including the late BC versions with the Adonai vowel notations superimposed, producing the account given above, with the resultant contradistinguised pronounciations he demonstrated for us as the source of Jehovah vs. Yahweh. that there is debate on the account is definitely noted, and if i myself was a student of hebrew i could say more on it, but not quite there yet, although on my more ambitious days i am tempted : )  in the meantime i lean on an esteemed authority who knows of what he speaks, and whose account would have to be as fully demonstrated against for the alternative to seem more true.</p>
<p>and it&#8217;s &#8216;their&#8217; not &#8216;there&#8217;<br />
(just one of my little english grammatical pet peeves)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine wright</title>
		<link>http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>EDIT last comment, (if you research that name with even using there books) should read " if you research that name 
without using there books"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EDIT last comment, (if you research that name with even using there books) should read &#8221; if you research that name<br />
without using there books&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine wright</title>
		<link>http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Jehovah is the english form of Yahweh, just like Jesus is the english form of Yesh'u'a,
We dont call Jesus Yeshua do we,no, we use the english form, Jesus, also it would be good
to do research on the word hallilujah, which literally is translated praise JAH, or if you
lived in Israel, praise YAH or YAW, so JW's didnt just pull the name Jehovah out of a hat, 
if you research that name with even using there books, you will find the truth about the
name Jehovah, and JW's have no problem telling the truth even if its unpopular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jehovah is the english form of Yahweh, just like Jesus is the english form of Yesh&#8217;u'a,<br />
We dont call Jesus Yeshua do we,no, we use the english form, Jesus, also it would be good<br />
to do research on the word hallilujah, which literally is translated praise JAH, or if you<br />
lived in Israel, praise YAH or YAW, so JW&#8217;s didnt just pull the name Jehovah out of a hat,<br />
if you research that name with even using there books, you will find the truth about the<br />
name Jehovah, and JW&#8217;s have no problem telling the truth even if its unpopular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Simone</title>
		<link>http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pilgrimoftheabsolute.com/2006/10/21/jehovah-emergence/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Although, there is also some scholarship which suggests that Jehovah is also a mispronunciations. Alternative pronuciations are (and more commonly accepted in protty circles)'Ya-way' or 'Ya-vey' and it is often transliterated 'Yaweh'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although, there is also some scholarship which suggests that Jehovah is also a mispronunciations. Alternative pronuciations are (and more commonly accepted in protty circles)&#8217;Ya-way&#8217; or &#8216;Ya-vey&#8217; and it is often transliterated &#8216;Yaweh&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

